Torah Pearls #12 – Vayechi (Genesis 47:28-50:26)

January 2, 2023

In this episode of The Original Torah Pearls Vayechi (Genesis 47:28-50:26), the final Genesis portion, Nehemia Gordon provides the cultural and geographical significance of the blessings to the 12 tribes. We learn the special inheritance given to the Levites, why their … Continue reading →

In this episode of The Original Torah Pearls Vayechi (Genesis 47:28-50:26), the final Genesis portion, Nehemia Gordon provides the cultural and geographical significance of the blessings to the 12 tribes. We learn the special inheritance given to the Levites, why their descendants are still traceable, why Reuben’s portion went to Joseph’s sons, and the significance of the “right hand.” From Jacob’s insistence that Joseph “swear” to him, we learn that the patriarchs knew God’s name and how to use it.

While Jacob’s artful use of the Hebrew poetic form is soul-stirringly beautiful in the original language, it leaves us with some guesswork in English. Gordon takes us on a literary tour of the quadruple alliterations, the sophisticated triple-plays on words, the dropped prepositions, and the use of rare words (or common words with rare connotations) that could be translated in wildly different ways. Other word studies include: “blessing,” “Shechem,” “Shiloh,” “gathered to his people,” the rare context of “angel,” and the unique structure of the name “Issachar.”

In closing, Gordon pronounces the traditional Sabbath blessing—“May you be like Ephraim and Manasseh”—and encourages listeners to receive from Yehovah—as a child at his knee with his hand on our head.

I look forward to reading your comments!

Audio TranscriptRead more

Transcript

Torah Pearls #12 – Vayechi (Genesis 47:28-50:26)

You are listening to The Original Torah Pearls with Nehemia Gordon, Keith Johnson, and Jono Vandor. Thank you for supporting Nehemia Gordon's Makor Hebrew Foundation. Learn more at NehemiasWall.com.

Jono: G’day to everybody listening wherever you may be around the world. Thank you for your company. It’s time for The Keith Johnson Show, together with his trusty sidekick Nehemia Gordon.

Nehemia: Wait, what?

Keith: Listen, I’m so glad you said that, Jono. Guess what, ladies and gentlemen? Starting out the New Year, my microphone is finally fixed. I’m no longer in the box of a phone, and I am so excited to be starting off the year here with Nehemia and Jono, where I can have some ability to speak clearly. So thank you Jono and Nehemia for finally teaching me how to do this.

Jono: Yeah, you’re no longer in “the cave in Siberia”, as one listener put it, and you’re absolutely crystal clear.

Nehemia: I’ve been trying to keep him in the cave. Why did you let him out, Jono?

Jono: Yes, the Keith Johnson Show. So since you’ve got your trusty sidekick Nehemia Gordon, karate expert. Since you’ve got your microphone fixed and everyone can hear your wonderful voice and I don’t have to do so much crazy editing every program, it’s wonderful having you. It is the final portion for Beresheit. This the first book of the Torah, we’re almost finished. This is the final one, and I just want to take the opportunity to say thank you, Keith and Nehemia, for all that you’ve brought to us in these discussions, and thank you to the listeners who have given us so much positive feedback regarding the Torah Pearls. It’s so encouraging.

Keith: Well, it’s interesting for me. I would just say this has become the highlight for me when we get a chance to sit and do this. It’s an anchor in my own personal reading programs that I have and things that I do for my connection to the Word of God. But it’s such a blessing when I think about Nehemia being in Israel and you being in Australia and myself being in the United States, and the many, many people that I keep hearing from that are so blessed by this. So I’m glad to finally have my microphone fixed. We’re gathering people in regards to all of the many things that are happening, and so many things are happening, and this is just an important part of it. So Jono again, we both are extremely thankful that you’ve given us this radio time.

Comments

shellMay 27, 2023 at 5:56 PM

Maybe this is a leftover from church, but whenever i hear verse 11 with the garments washed in wine, i always thought of this verse, and vise versa. Do you think theyre related or do you think they just have a similar look?

Isa 63: v2. Wherefore [art thou] red in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth in the winefat?
v3. I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people [there was] none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.

ReneeJanuary 6, 2023 at 9:11 AM

Hi, thank you for these wonderful teachings!

I was curious about the phrase in Gen 48:12 translated “from between,” and the thought of the 2 boys sitting on grandpa’s knees. They could be 16-18 years old by now, so that mental image does not compute as easily. Maybe that translation is why most paintings of the event show boys in the age range of perhaps 5-8.

The Strong’s concordance gives alternate meanings for עִם such as “toward” or “beside” or “unto,” which would also work in the context, and especially for young men… Joseph brought them toward, beside, unto his (JACOB’s) knees בֶּרֶךְ (v10) to receive the בָּרַךְ .

Gen 49:10 also uses “from between” : “nor a lawgiver FROM BETWEEN his feet.”

But this time translated from
. בַּיִן

Thank you for sharing the insight that Yah has blessed y’all with!

Courtney AbramsDecember 18, 2021 at 12:10 PM

Based on the Torah, Dina did not get any inheritance. Daughters were only entitled to inheritance if their father had no son, as in the case of Zelophehad’s daughters. (Numbers 27:1-11)

“Say to the Israelites, ‘If a man dies and leaves no son, give his inheritance to his daughter.”
(Numbers 27:8 NIV)

Zelophehad had no sons, only daughters, so his daughters received his inheritance. (Joshua 17:3-4) However, daughters that received inheritance must marry within their father’s tribal clan. (Numbers 36:1-13)

Another logical reason that shows Dina did not receive an inheritance is that later the promised land was divided among the twelve sons of Jacob with a double potion going to Joseph.

Daughters who had brothers get what their husbands inherited. If Dina were given in marriage to Shechem, she would have benefited from what Shechem inherited from Hamor, his father.

Jeremy HulaDecember 13, 2021 at 3:43 PM

Yeshua must be the angel.

Cindy VaughanJuly 13, 2021 at 2:52 PM

Did Dina get land or a blessing ?

Klodjana KecoMay 18, 2020 at 3:26 PM

Hello! I am a little bit late following you on this.
I’ve been reading in English and listening in Hebrew the book of Genesis. And it came to pass that as I was listening to it, have in mind that I cannot understand Hebrew, anyway, I noticed that Judah’s third son name was something like ‘Shelah’, or ‘Shiloh’. Could it have any connection with Jacob’s blessing for Judah (‘until Shiloh comes’).
And secondly do these words have any connection with the word ‘Selah’ that we find often in the Psalms.
Thank you and please bear with my elementary question, if!

God Bless you all!
Nehemia thanks for the special blessing in this podcast!

donald murphyJanuary 18, 2020 at 5:17 PM

only the tribe of Judah is jewish

julie KalashnikoffJanuary 12, 2020 at 11:34 PM

first born refers to spiritual aspect as in Self will being first. Self will will never be blessed. This is why the expression “you must be born again” /born of the will of “I AM” (2nd birth). IT is those sho are born of the Will of “I AM”/2nd birth that receive the blessing of “I AM” our Father. Father means “generator”. He generates His will through us!

Ronald PeloquinJanuary 11, 2020 at 7:50 PM

I loved this torah portion. I have a question for all three men. In Genesis 48:19
“His father refused, and said, “I know, my son, I know. He also will become a people, and he also will be great. However, his younger brother will be greater than he, and his offspring(will become a multitude of nations.)Jewish Complete Bible
My question is does Ephraim become a multitude of Gentile nations some time into the future losing his jewish identity i thought Ephraim would always be jewish no matter where he migrated to after being taken into Assyria? What does Jacob mean whenbbn he say’s Epgraim’s offspring will become a multitude of nations הַגּוֹיִֽם Goy gentile nations? Its a puzzle to me did the tribe lose their bloodline like at babylon it is confusion. Help me understand this verse please.

LOUIS C KORKAMESJanuary 8, 2020 at 2:47 PM

The image of God blessing us by putting us on His knees brings me to tears! Praise God!

Owen MurphyJanuary 6, 2020 at 6:51 PM

Great study – Micah 4:4 After the ‘regathering’ – Ezekiel 37:1 -28 everyone will sit under ‘his’ Joseph’s vine and ‘his’ Judah’s fig tree and none shall make them afraid. Judah and Joseph as powerful combo?

julie kalashnikoffDecember 22, 2018 at 8:11 PM

The first born did not receive the blessing because it is a type and shadow of the first Adam who chose self will above the will of “I AM”. The 2nd born is a type and shaddow of the 2nd Adam which is Christ, meaning annointed, meaning the will of “I AM”

Fran BrashearDecember 22, 2018 at 1:17 PM

Shabbat shalom, Todd! I’d never thought of it that way, and it is very interesting.

Fran BrashearDecember 22, 2018 at 1:13 PM

I’ve just been pondering if the blessing for the tribe of Asher mentioned (rich food and danties fit for kings) could possibly be the ‘Words’ of Yehovah from scribe Aaron ben Moshe ben Asher (man shall not live by bread alone but by every word of Yehovah). The word of Yehovah IS rich food and danties fit for kings.

Gavriel BootelDecember 21, 2018 at 4:04 PM

I find it interesting that none of the first born received the blessings, Yishmael was the first born, Esau was the first born as was Manasheh, and all for good reason.

Gavriel BootelDecember 21, 2018 at 4:02 PM

I personally believe as no one has ever seen Yah’s face, that it had to be Yeshua / Malkitzedik, King of Righteousness. Yeshua sits at the right hand of His Father, and also we see Yeshua praying to His Father, so Yeshua is not His Father, and Yeshua is not YHWH, and that is based on Scripture.

Todd CorderDecember 17, 2018 at 6:33 PM

Something to ponder. Joseph was the firstborn of the wife Jacob chose and struck the deal and worked for. However, Jacob didn’t get Rachel on the wedding night, he was given Leah and didn’t know it until morning. How? wedding wine and no electricity. Yes, technically Ruben was born first, but not by the wife he chose and worked for by contract. If you look how Jacob arranged his offspring when traveling home and going to meet Esau. Might indicate that Jacob indeed felt that Joseph was his firstborn. The same with the special coat for Joseph.

TomDecember 17, 2018 at 5:41 PM

I love your Torah pearls thank you so much I found in the book of jasher that abhram new God from the age of three

bigfaithgirlDecember 30, 2017 at 4:33 PM

Thank you for the blessing.I have no family. And I consider all of you family.

suzanhollandApril 29, 2017 at 4:26 PM

Observation: “Angel” = messenger of God; sent one. Discussion in this presentation (and I’ve heard this talked about in at least one other presentation), was that the angel is NOT God, but “just a messenger who represents God and can speak on His behalf (as if God).” I find this a bit difficult to accept given the specific language used in a variety of texts (in the Tanakh) that seem to imply the Angel is a manifestation/apparition of God Himself (personal pronouns, etc.). I know “the arguments”, but just doesn’t seem honest to the plain reading of the text. Furthermore, Yeshua was “sent by God” and is not “an Angel” but God, Himself (incarnate), so this is a very important subject. The Ruach is also “sent by God” and IS God, so, I feel it is an oversimplification to dismiss this “Angel” as “just an angel.” (And I fully understand that not all accept that Yeshua is God/part of the Godhead, or that the Ruach is a “third person of the Trinity”, but that is what the Brit Hadasha claims and seems, in this regard, to be consistent with the plain reading of the Tanakh.) Shabbat shalom

Joy MathewJanuary 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM

Maybe wherever a poetic form is used in Scripture could mean an indication of prophecy .

MarilouJanuary 10, 2017 at 1:10 AM

Amen

Jason.January 9, 2017 at 4:36 PM

I listen to the podcast all day at work,they are truly a blessing,I learn so much and they are funny too. A truly great podcast.

RachelJanuary 3, 2015 at 6:33 PM

I listened to this Torah pearls so many times! Nehemia, Keith and Jono did great job! May JHVH bless you all!

Tova WolfsonJanuary 3, 2015 at 6:01 PM

Why did you not say anything about explaining the verses for the tribe of Benjamin? You read it and then went on to the burial of Joesph. I waited for one hour and 10 minutes, then nothing. Please stay more focused and leave the levity until after the important talk. Love Torah Pearls.

Stubblefield, HermanJanuary 3, 2015 at 3:03 PM

Thank you (all of you) for sharing your knowledge with us…we are truly learning a lot every week.

EliamJanuary 3, 2015 at 2:44 AM

I just wonder is it possible that Keith has his roots from Ham, Jono from Yapheth and Nehemia from Shem, the sons of Noach. If yes, what is Yah trying to do and the significance?

JaniceJanuary 2, 2015 at 7:17 PM

May you be like Ephraim and Menasse? Thou you are born outside the promised land, the sons of an Eqyptian; we can adopt you into our Covenant family, Kingdom of G-d, and you will be treated as a native born.

Please sign in or sign up to add a comment.

Stay Connected

Subscribe to receive new teachings, event updates, and special announcements.